Poland’s coal-related mercury emissions revised upward, significantly

first_imgPoland’s coal-related mercury emissions revised upward, significantly FacebookTwitterLinkedInEmailPrint分享MetaMag:Polish coal-fired power plants may be cheating the European Union when reporting their toxic mercury emissions, Gazeta Wyborcza reports. As a result, a huge year-on-year increase in emissions from Europe’s biggest coal plant may be even higher than first thought.Last month META broke the story that mercury emission from Polish coal had jumped by more than 87.5% in just one year. EU data showed emissions from the giant Bełchatów plant in central Poland were eighteen times higher in 2016 than the previous year. Now a Gazeta Wyborcza story published last week has claimed that the mercury emissions for 2016 – reported as an enormous 2.82 tonnes – could in reality be even higher. The paper was shown emissions monitoring data that experts said point to mercury emissions of closer to 4.2 tonnes – 1.5 tonnes more than reported.Mercury is a dangerous neurotoxin which damages human health and can destroy lives. Europe has committed to the Minamata Convention to phase out and limit mercury emissions from human sources and the EU’s Mercury Regulation was adopted last year. Across Europe burning coal is the single biggest source of mercury pollution entering the air. It is often carried over long distances and finds its way into the food-chain through bioaccumulation in large fish.Pressure grew on plant owner PGE to explain the discrepancy as campaigners explained that the increase was due to a new European law that requires the emissions reported to European authorities be based on actual monitoring data. Reported figured were previously estimated. PGE’s estimations for 2015 had been 18 times lower than the reported measured emissions for 2016.After digging deeper into the story, Gazeta Wyborcza reported that even under the new EU monitoring and reporting regime, the plant operators are allowed to take periodic measurements and then declare an average across the year. It is therefore possible that higher measurements were discarded and lower ones used to calculate annual emissions. Wyborcza also said the same practice may be being used by other power stations, including the Pątnów and Turów plants.More: Polish coal may be cheating EU on toxic mercurylast_img read more

Good Governance: Achieving a strategic rhythm

first_imgAs recently as 10 years ago, many credit unions did not have a strategic plan. As rapid change and financial disruption came to financial services, CUs caught up with the rest of corporate America and now it’s hard to find a credit union that doesn’t have an annual retreat and resulting plan document. Despite this investment, national board surveys across all business domains suggest boards believe they lack a strategic orientation, don’t spend enough time on strategy, and spend way too much time looking into the rear-view mirror.We know that boards of directors set mission, values, direction and strategy for their organization—and, as such, must act as a strategic asset partnering actively with the CEO and executive team. This calls for an annual rhythm for addressing, tracking and recalibrating strategy that assures time for authentic dialogue, risk assessment and innovative thinking about a vibrant and relevant future for the organization. High performance boards achieve this by (a) having an annual discipline around developing, approving, and tracking strategy and (b) investing close to 70 percent of board effort on strategic thinking and planning.Achieving a RhythmA strategic rhythm is a strong, regular and systematic pattern of developing business awareness, considering strategic scenarios, creating strategic initiatives, re-calibrating strategy in real time as tactics are rolled out and, ultimately, strategically tracking achievement. This goes way beyond the once-a-year annual retreat. continue reading » 3SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblrlast_img read more